Преглед

  • Дата на основаване септември 23, 1915
  • Сектори Автомобили, Автосервизи, Бензиностанции
  • Публикувани работни места 0
  • Разгледано 6

Описание на компанията

Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly large language designs (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These include chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu in addition to many smaller firms have actually established generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has uses throughout a wide variety of industries, including software application advancement, healthcare, financing, home entertainment, client service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] fashion, [18] and product design. [19] However, concerns have been raised about the possible misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using phony news or deepfakes to trick or manipulate people, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Copyright law issues likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and emulate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its inception, scientists in the field have actually raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of developing synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have previously been checked out by misconception, fiction and philosophy given that antiquity. [23] The concept of automatic art go back at least to the robot of ancient Greek civilization, where inventors such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were described as having designed devices capable of composing text, creating noises, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of imaginative automations has grown throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been utilized to design natural languages because their advancement by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the novel Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The scholastic discipline of synthetic intelligence was established at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced a number of waves of improvement and optimism in the years considering that. [31] Expert system research started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have used synthetic intelligence to create artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and displaying generative AI works developed by AARON, the computer system program Cohen developed to produce paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI planning or generative planning were used in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI planning systems, especially computer-aided procedure planning, used to produce series of actions to reach a defined goal. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems used symbolic AI methods such as state area search and constraint complete satisfaction and were a „fairly mature“ innovation by the early 1990s. They were used to generate crisis action prepare for military usage, [35] process prepare for producing [33] and choice plans such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural nets (2014-2019)

Since its inception, the field of device knowing used both discriminative designs and generative designs, to model and predict information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the emergence of deep knowing drove development and research study in image classification, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this age were normally trained as discriminative models, due to the difficulty of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, developments such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the first practical deep neural networks capable of discovering generative designs, rather than discriminative ones, for intricate data such as images. These deep generative designs were the very first to output not only class labels for images but likewise whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed advancements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] causing the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), called GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize without supervision to various jobs as a Structure design. [40]

The brand-new generative designs introduced throughout this duration enabled for big neural networks to be trained utilizing not being watched learning or semi-supervised learning, rather than the monitored knowing common of discriminative models. Unsupervised knowing got rid of the need for humans to by hand identify information, enabling bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, developed by a confidential MIT researcher, was a free web application that could generate convincing character voices using minimal training information. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, influencing subsequent developments in voice AI technology. [43] [44]

In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to top quality artificial intelligence art production from natural language prompts. [46] These systems demonstrated extraordinary abilities in generating photorealistic images, artwork, and designs based on text descriptions, resulting in prevalent adoption amongst artists, designers, and the general public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT transformed the availability and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s capability to participate in natural conversations, produce innovative material, help with coding, and carry out various analytical tasks captured global attention and triggered prevalent discussion about AI’s prospective effect on work, education, and creativity. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI abilities. A team from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it „might reasonably be deemed an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial basic intelligence (AGI) system.“ [49] However, this assessment was objected to by other scholars who kept that generative AI remained „still far from reaching the standard of ‘basic human intelligence'“ as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta released ImageBind, an AI design combining multiple techniques consisting of text, images, video, thermal information, 3D data, audio, and movement, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI model offered in four versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and announced plans for „Bard Advanced“ powered by the larger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google combined Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, releasing a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 family of big language models, consisting of Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models showed considerable improvements in capabilities across various standards, with Claude 3 Opus notably surpassing leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated enhanced efficiency compared to the bigger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has emerged as a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants using the technology, exceeding both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is further evidenced by China’s intellectual home advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly surpassing the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by using unsupervised maker learning (conjuring up for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised maker discovering trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend on the technique or kind of the data set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For instance, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens consist of GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language models). They are capable of natural language processing, device translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as structure designs for other tasks. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language models can be trained on shows language text, enabling them to create source code for new computer system programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing high-quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly utilized for text-to-image generation and neural design transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, launched in March 2020, which demonstrated the ability to clone character voices utilizing just 15 seconds of training information. [67] The website got prevalent attention for its ability to produce emotionally meaningful speech for different fictional characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options consequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can also be trained on the audio waveforms of recorded music together with text annotations, in order to generate brand-new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a relaxing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been produced, like the tune Savages, which utilized AI to simulate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising an argument about whether artists ought to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been developed that can be generated utilizing a text phrase, category choices, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video clips. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the movements of a robotic system to create new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research utilizes triggers like „get blue bowl“ or „wipe plate with yellow sponge“ to control motions of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal „vision-language-action“ designs such as Google’s RT-2 can perform simple thinking in response to user triggers and visual input, such as picking up a toy dinosaur when provided the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other things. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially intelligent computer-aided style (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might likewise be developed using connected open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to help enhance workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are utilized to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, programming tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have been incorporated into a range of existing commercially offered products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are likewise offered as open-source software application, consisting of Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI designs with as much as a few billion criteria can work on mobile phones, embedded gadgets, and desktop computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion specifications) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger designs with 10s of billions of specifications can run on laptop or desktop. To achieve an appropriate speed, models of this size might need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon products. For example, the 65 billion specification variation of LLaMA can be set up to operate on a desktop PC. [91]

The advantages of running generative AI locally include protection of personal privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular concentrates on utilizing consumer-grade video gaming graphics cards [92] through such methods as compression. That forum is among only two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has advocated open-source models for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI security. [95]

Language models with hundreds of billions of parameters, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, normally work on datacenter computer systems geared up with varieties of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large models are generally accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed restrictions on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to fulfill the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software on the market capable of acknowledging text created by generative synthetic intelligence (such as GPTZero), along with images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation techniques for discovering generative AI content include digital watermarking, content authentication, details retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both free and paid AI text detectors have frequently produced incorrect positives, erroneously accusing students of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and policy

In the United States, a group of companies including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to require all US companies to report info to the federal government when training specific high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Expert system Act includes requirements to divulge copyrighted product utilized to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China controls any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark generated images or videos, policies on training information and label quality, constraints on personal information collection, and a guideline that generative AI must „follow socialist core values“. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, openly offered datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI designers have actually argued that such training is secured under reasonable usage, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of reasonable use training have argued that it is a transformative usage and does not involve making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the general public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs take on the content they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, several claims associated with using copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has sued Stability AI over using its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York Times have actually taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over the usage of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A separate question is whether AI-generated works can certify for copyright defense. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works created by synthetic intelligence without any human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they lack human authorship. [116] However, the office has actually also started taking public input to identify if these guidelines need to be improved for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The advancement of generative AI has actually raised issues from federal governments, businesses, and people, leading to protests, legal actions, calls to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by multiple federal governments. In a July 2023 rundown of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres specified „Generative AI has huge capacity for excellent and wicked at scale“, that AI may „turbocharge worldwide advancement“ and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, however that its malicious usage „might cause dreadful levels of death and destruction, widespread trauma, and deep mental damage on an unimaginable scale“. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have been arguments advanced by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computer systems actually should be done by them, provided the distinction in between computer systems and people, and between quantitative calculations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has led to 70% of the tasks for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor disagreements. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that „artificial intelligence poses an existential threat to imaginative professions“ during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been viewed as a possible difficulty to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The intersection of AI and work concerns among underrepresented groups globally stays a vital element. While AI assures efficiency improvements and skill acquisition, issues about job displacement and prejudiced recruiting processes continue among these groups, as described in surveys by Fast Company. To utilize AI for a more fair society, proactive actions encompass mitigating predispositions, advocating transparency, respecting privacy and approval, and accepting diverse groups and ethical considerations. Strategies include rerouting policy focus on policy, inclusive design, and education’s potential for personalized teaching to take full advantage of advantages while decreasing harms. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI designs can reflect and enhance any cultural bias present in the underlying data. For example, a language model may assume that physicians and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions prevail in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image model prompted with the text „a photo of a CEO“ may disproportionately produce images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased information set. A number of techniques for reducing predisposition have actually been tried, such as altering input triggers [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of „deep knowing“ and „fake“ [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and change them with somebody else’s likeness utilizing synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have gathered extensive attention and concerns for their uses in deepfake celebrity adult videos, revenge pornography, phony news, scams, health disinformation, financial fraud, and hidden foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited reactions from both market and federal government to identify and limit their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically discovered that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when triggered to do so, such as images of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (distributed ledger technology) to promote „openness, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and usage“. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to create controversial declarations in the vocal design of celebrities, public officials, and other well-known individuals have raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have actually mentioned that they would work on mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The very same software used to clone voices has actually been utilized on famous musicians’ voices to develop tunes that mimic their voices, acquiring both tremendous appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar strategies have also been used to develop improved quality or full-length versions of tunes that have been leaked or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has actually also been utilized to create new digital artist characters, with some of these getting adequate attention to get record offers at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually also faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, including reaction for „dehumanizing“ an artform, and also producing artists which create unrealistic or unethical interest their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to produce practical phony content has actually been made use of in various kinds of cybercrime, including phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been utilized to create disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos end up being completely realistic, they would stop appearing remarkable to viewers, potentially resulting in uncritical acceptance of incorrect info. [159] Additionally, large language models and other forms of text-generation AI have been utilized to develop phony evaluations of e-commerce websites to increase scores. [160] Cybercriminals have created big language designs focused on fraud, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 research study revealed that generative AI can be vulnerable to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, allowing assailants to obtain aid with damaging demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have actually shown that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their safety constraints at low expense. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI designs needs a massive amount of calculating power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the funds to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up buying access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have actually revealed issues about the ecological impact that the development and release of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big quantities of freshwater utilized for information centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical power usage. [170] [166] [171] There is also issue that these effects may increase as these models are included into widely utilized online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as designs require to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation strategies consist of factoring possible ecological costs prior to design advancement or data collection, [165] increasing efficiency of information centers to minimize electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] developing more efficient device discovering designs, [168] [166] [169] minimizing the variety of times that designs require to be re-trained, [167] developing a government-directed framework for auditing the environmental effect of these models, [168] [167] controling for transparency of these designs, [167] controling their energy and water use, [168] encouraging scientists to publish data on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject matter experts who understand both artificial intelligence and climate science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times defines slop as comparable to spam: „shoddy or unwanted A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search results.“ [172] Journalists have actually expressed issues about the scale of low-grade generated content with respect to social media material moderation, [173] the financial incentives from social media companies to spread out such content, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical term paper submissions, [175] increased time and effort to discover higher quality or preferred material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated content by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper released by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a snapshot of websites, were machine equated. A lot of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, particularly for sentences that were translated across at least 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated across more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that calculated word frequencies based on text from the Internet, revealed that she had stopped upgrading the data for numerous reasons: high expenses for getting data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive concentrate on generative AI compared to other approaches in the natural language processing neighborhood, and that „generative AI has contaminated the information“. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools led to an explosion of AI-generated material throughout numerous domains. A study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of freshly released computer science documents and 16.9% of peer review text now integrate content produced by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a similar trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that an average of 34 million images have actually been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had actually been created utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by models based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated material is consisted of in new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI models, flaws in the resulting models may take place. [185] Training an AI model exclusively on the output of another AI model produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this process, where each new design is trained on the previous design’s output, results in progressive destruction and ultimately leads to a „design collapse“ after multiple versions. [186] Tests have been performed with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As an effect, the value of information collected from authentic human interactions with systems might end up being progressively valuable in the presence of LLM-generated material in data crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial information is typically utilized as an option to data produced by real-world events. Such information can be deployed to confirm mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence models while maintaining user privacy, [188] consisting of for structured information. [189] The method is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been utilized to train computer system vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been utilizing an undisclosed internal AI tool to write at least 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET posted corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a fake AI-generated interview with previous racing chauffeur Michael Schumacher, who had actually not made any public looks given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding accident. The story included 2 possible disclosures: the cover included the line „stealthily real“, and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon afterwards in the middle of the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have actually published posts whose content and/or byline have actually been validated or believed to be created by generative AI models – often with false content, mistakes, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had utilized generative AI to produce short articles for a lot of the abovementioned outlets, appeared to show that they „had produced 10s of countless posts for more than 150 publishers.“ [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based on Generative AI models, prompting concerns about job losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has actually historically been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material developers or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically generated anchors have likewise been utilized by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to „produce newspaper article“ based on input information provided, such as „information of present occasions“. Some news business executives who viewed the pitch explained it as“ [taking] for given the effort that entered into producing accurate and artful newspaper article.“ [224]

In February 2024, Google introduced a program to pay little publishers to write 3 posts each day using a beta generative AI design. The program does not need the knowledge or permission of the sites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it require the published posts to be identified as being developed or assisted by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually gone through cybersquatting, with articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed issue that generative AI might have a damaging impact on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for exploring with generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI companies producing a dependence for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which sums up news stories, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially more reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In reaction to potential pitfalls around the usage and misuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about declining audience trust, outlets worldwide, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have released guidelines around how they plan to utilize and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uneasy with news produced by „mostly AI with some human oversight“, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by „generally human with some assistance from AI“. The outcomes of global surveys reported that individuals were more uncomfortable with news subjects consisting of politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer programming website

Technology portal

Artificial general intelligence – Kind of AI with wide-ranging abilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Expert system art – Visual media developed with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that replicates discussion
Computational imagination – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing approach
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of big language design
Large language model – Kind of artificial intelligence model
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to produce music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is produced algorithmically as opposed to manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of information retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in maker learning

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). „Executive Order N-12-23“ (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). „Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework“. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ „What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?“. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ „What is generative AI?“. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). „Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained“. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). „Generative models“. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). „Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding“. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). „A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings“. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). „OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race“. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). „LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications“. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). „A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze“. The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). „OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos“. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ „The race of the AI laboratories heats up“. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). „Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, companies, and federal governments“. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ „Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse simply yet“. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). „In Hollywood authors’ fight against AI, people win (for now)“. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. „Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion“. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ „How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity“. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). „Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI“. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). „Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the effect of generative AI on misinformation are overblown“. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ „New AI systems collide with copyright law“. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, obtained October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), „The Automata in the Byzantine „Throne of Solomon““, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). „Maillardet’s Automaton“. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). „First Links in the Markov Chain“. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). „The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications“. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York City, New York: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). „A Short History of Generative AI“ (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). „Computer assisted process planning: the advanced study“. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). „Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft“. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a conventional generative AI organizer based upon the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control part is a conventional spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also add an architectural element clearly dedicated to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). „A Thorough Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT“. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ „finetune-transformer-lm“. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). „Language models are not being watched multitask students“ (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). „Improving language comprehending with not being watched learning“. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). „Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning“. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). „15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon“. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). „Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?“. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some type considering that ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). „OpenAI’s DALL-E develops possible images of literally anything you ask it to“. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ „Stable Diffusion Public Release“. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). „What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change human beings?“. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). „How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an „anything tool““. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). „Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4“. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). „ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research and Science“. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ „Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that combines 6 types of information“. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). „Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI“. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). „Google releases Gemini-an effective AI design it says can exceed GPT-4“. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). „Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant“. The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ „Introducing the next generation of Claude“. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). „Anthropic unveils Claude 3, exceeding GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests“. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). „Anthropic has a quick new AI model – and a creative new way to interact with chatbots“. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). „China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study shows“. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ „A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4“. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ „Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?“. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). „Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.'“. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). „On the chances and threats of structure models“. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). „Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code“. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ „Investing in Cursor“. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex „Sandy“; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). „Art and the science of generative AI„. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). „Zero-shot text-to-image generation“. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). „Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence“. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). „15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon“. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). „Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App“. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). „ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる“ [Game Character Voice Reading Software „15. ai“ Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that just English voices are available.; Another significant feature of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). „A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless“. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). „MusicLM: Generating Music From Text“. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). „Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 „premium“ certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers outlined in a paper the ethical challenges that they encountered around the advancement of generative AI designs like MusicGen“. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ „Jay-Z’s Delaware producer triggers argument over AI rights“. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ „10 „Best“ AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI“. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). „Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology“. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). „Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text“. cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). „UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation“. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). „RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control“. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). „10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators“. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ „Slash CAD model construct times with new AI-driven part creation approach|GlobalSpec“. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ „The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry“. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). „GitHub has a vision to make code more secure by design“. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). „Text-to-video AI inches closer as startup Runway announces brand-new model“. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though existing output is simple. Runway states it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). „Microsoft adds OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel“. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of service software … the new A.I. features, called Copilot, will be readily available in a few of the company’s most popular company apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). „The app’s Memories function just got a big upgrade“. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a redesigned, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll be able to utilize generative AI to come up with some recommended names like „a desert adventure“.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). „Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop“. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will become one of the most essential features for innovative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into design.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). „LLaMA 2: How to access and usage Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot right now“. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you want to run LLaMA 2 by yourself maker or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). „How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4“. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can produce a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). „“Draw Things“ App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone“. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are produced locally, so you don’t need a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). „Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)“. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model at home, you will require a computer system build with a powerful GPU that can handle the big amount of data and calculation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). „Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot“. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). „I basically only trust 2 LLM evals today“ (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). „Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …“ (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). „Open source platforms * increase * security and security“ (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). „U.S. authorities order Nvidia to halt sales of leading AI chips to China“. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). „Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed“. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while abiding by strict U.S. export requirements that restrict how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). „How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions“. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ „5 complimentary software application to identify phony AI-generated images“ (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ „Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond“. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). „We evaluated a brand-new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee“. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). „Detecting AI might be difficult. That’s a big issue for teachers“. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). „OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI material for security, White House states“. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ „FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence“. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). „3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI“. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ „EU AI Act: first guideline on expert system“. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). „EU legislators choose tougher AI guidelines as draft transfer to last“. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). „China says generative AI rules to use only to products for the public“. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ „生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法“. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b „Generative Expert system and Copyright Law“. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). „We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image“. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). „The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots“. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). „Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise welcoming the technology“. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). „The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Starting“. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). „New York City Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement“. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). „AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court says“. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). „US Copyright Office wants to hear what individuals consider AI and copyright“. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ „Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence“. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ „The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI“. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). „Lessons from Eliza“. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). „AI is currently taking video game illustrators’ tasks in China“. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). „China’s game art market reportedly annihilated by growing AI use“. Game Developer. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). „Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of innovative tech“. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding a contract that clearly requires AI guidelines to safeguard authors and the works they produce. … The future of generative synthetic intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be used to replace labor-has end up being an essential sticking point for stars going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently understood as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system presents an existential danger to creative occupations, and all stars and entertainers are worthy of contract language that safeguards them from having their identity and talent exploited without consent and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). „ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools launch out of beta“. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. „‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods“. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). „Underrepresented groups in countries all over the world are stressed over AI being a threat to jobs“. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). „Large language models are biased. Can logic help conserve them?“. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). „Reducing bias and improving security in DALL · E 2“. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). „No fast fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 showed the challenges of bias in AI“. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ „DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations“. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). „Terrifying modern porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise“. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). „We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now“. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ „What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying“. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ „Experts fear face swapping tech might start a worldwide showdown“. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). „Here Come the Fake Videos, Too“. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). „Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting“. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). „Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance“. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). „U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election“. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). „Russia, Iran utilize AI to boost anti-U.S. influence projects, authorities state“. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ „Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)“. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). „H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019“. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ „New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections“. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). „Disinformation wars: The battle against phony news in the age of AI“. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). „Navigating the challenges of generative innovations: Proposing the integration of synthetic intelligence and blockchain“. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ „People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips“. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ „The generative A.I. software application race has started“. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). „Elections in UK and US at danger from AI-driven disinformation, state specialists“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ „Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes“. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). „4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to create celebrity hatespeech“. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). „Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.“ The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ „A brand-new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake star audio clips“. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). „Just Because AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good“. Wanderer. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). „An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World“. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). „AI tunes that mimic popular artists raising alarms in the music market“. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. „Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs“. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. „Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?“. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). „Warner Music indications first-ever record handle AI pop star“. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). „Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0“. Fast Company. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. „As social media platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ anticipates the biggest risk is that deepfakes will ultimately end up being dull“. Business Insider. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). „Fake reviews: can we trust what we checked out online as usage of AI takes off?“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ „After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data“. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). „From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy“. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). „Should we make our most effective AI models open source to all?“. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). „In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends“. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). „On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?“. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York City, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d „AI is an energy hog. This is what it indicates for climate modification“. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). „The carbon effect of expert system“. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). „Generative AI’s ecological costs are soaring – and primarily secret“. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. „AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era“. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). „Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer researcher describes the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins“. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). „Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?“. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). „First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop'“. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b „Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook“. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). „The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop“. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). „Research AI design unexpectedly tries to customize its own code to extend runtime“. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). „Spam, junk … slop? The current wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). „Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles“. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ „Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop“. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). „A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism“. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). „A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine“. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). „Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'“. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually constantly been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, „it was manageable and often recognizable. Large language models create text that masquerades as genuine language with intent behind it, despite the fact that there is none, and their output emerge everywhere,“ she composed. She provides the example that ChatGPT overuses the word „delve,“ in a method that individuals do not, which has tossed off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). „ChatGPT „contamination“: estimating the occurrence of LLMs in the academic literature“. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). „How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?“. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). „AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI“. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). „AI designs collapse when trained on recursively generated data“. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). „When A.I.’s Output Is a Risk to A.I. Itself“. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ „Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad“. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). „Synthetic Data for Better Artificial Intelligence“. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). „Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data“. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). „Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion“. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). „CNET discovered mistakes in over half of its AI-written stories“. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ „A publication touted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was actually AI“. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). „Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is „Entirely“ Made Up“. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ „NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ using AI“. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). „Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers“. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). „Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article“. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). „B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person“. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). „USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage“. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). „Dispatch stops briefly AI sports writing program“. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). „Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today site. Did these authors exist?“. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioning „Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry“. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). „How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business“. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). „News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian local newspaper article a week“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). „Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Move to AI Content“. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). „Coming to your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories“. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). „The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb“. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). „Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors“. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). „Irish Times apologises for hoax AI post about ladies’s use of phony tan“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). „CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error“. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). „BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles“. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ „Newsweek is making generative AI a fixture in its newsroom“. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ „What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and absolutely nothing“. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ „AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for traditional publishers?“. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). „A national network of local news sites is publishing AI-written articles under fake bylines. Experts are raising alarm“. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ „Wyoming reporter caught using expert system to develop phony quotes and stories“. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ „Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders“. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ „AI-generated posts are permeating significant news publications“. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). „Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans“. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ „Apple says it will upgrade AI feature after inaccurate news informs“. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ „TV channels are using AI-generated speakers to read the news. The concern is, will we trust them?“. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). „‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). „World’s first AI news anchor revealed in China“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ „These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real“. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). „Google Tests A.I. Tool That Has The Ability To Write News Articles“. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). „Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform“. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). „Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin“. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). „How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm“. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). „A Cherished Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff“. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). „Early Apple tech bloggers are surprised to discover their name and work have actually been AI-zombified“. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ „AI slop is already getting into Oregon’s regional journalism“. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). „How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory“. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). „We Need Your Email Address“. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ „Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket“. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). „Senators alert AI could cause ‘damage’ of local news“. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ „OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news deal“. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). „Meta left news. Now the company’s utilizing it for AI material“. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ „How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools“. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). „Standards around generative AI“. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). „The Guardian’s technique to generative AI“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). „Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 worldwide news organisations“. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). „Digital Report 2024“ (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

„Проектиране и разработка на софтуерни платформи - кариерен център със система за проследяване реализацията на завършилите студенти и обща информационна мрежа на кариерните центрове по проект BG05M2ОP001-2.016-0022 „Модернизация на висшето образование по устойчиво използване на природните ресурси в България“, финансиран от Оперативна програма „Наука и образование за интелигентен растеж“, съфинансирана от Европейския съюз чрез Европейските структурни и инвестиционни фондове."

LTU Sofia

Отговаряме бързо!

Здравейте, Добре дошли в сайта. Моля, натиснете бутона по-долу, за да се свържите с нас през Viber.