Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says

Our new Deepseek-based AI states „Chiefs vs Eagles? … How Predictable“

Super Bowl predictions from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can anticipate the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its finest shot. With up to date news and a little but feisty 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly predicting the unpredictable. Join us as we try to address humankind’s toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pressing concerns that are less simple to pin down. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a large language model to be better at anticipating the future (and wavedream.wiki have actually seen some appealing improvements – term paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion parameter design which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, demo.qkseo.in its knowledge cutoff is from many months earlier so we have developed an „agentic pipeline“ to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown area to make its best forecast possible.

And Now … The Important Questions

We presented the following questions to our AI and assessed its response. While we have seen prediction improvements from our training, use these quotes for prop wagering at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis’ relationship is rock solid, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition …

First, I’ll take a look at the bottom lines from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He’s a big football star, valetinowiki.racing and she’s been supportive of his career, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, classicalmusicmp3freedownload.com showing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given remarks Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he’s plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the odds and his reactions suggest it’s more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I ‘d approximate a low possibility, perhaps around 5%, thinking about all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 „tush-pushes“ throughout the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn’t stopped the Eagles from using their signature „tush-push“ move, now its just a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a „tush-push“ is? Does an AI even understand what a „tush“ is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen’s similar attempts? Appears like our AI believes they’ll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I’m trying to figure out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 „tush-pushes“ during the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand what precisely a „tush-push“ is. From the articles, it looks like it’s a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off protectors. It’s compared to pushing a heavy box, so it’s a physical maneuver that requires strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the „tush-push.“ It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to perform the relocation. The article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is quite high. … I also need to think of the protective methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles’ „tush-push“ method, they may change their defense accordingly, which might either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a significant number but possible offered their confidence, I would estimate a possibility around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, self-confidence in the method, and the possibility that they’ll use it numerous times, particularly if it’s efficient early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn’t going to back down from a battle.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He’s done this in his songs, like „The Heart Part 4,“ and even made a declaration during a previous halftime program when Trump existed in 2018. That seems considerable because it reveals he’s done it before, wiki.eqoarevival.com so perhaps he’ll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent posts, it mentions that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That might mean he’s less most likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he’s also associated with a feud with Drake, which may give him factors to make some public statements, even if they’re not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track „Not Like Us.“ There’s a defamation fit from Drake, so maybe he bewares about including any questionable songs in the performance. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it’s uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar might feel obliged to make a . However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements during the halftime show, so there’s a danger that such material may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant carry on big phases. He’s the first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which may provide him more imaginative flexibility. Plus, his previous behavior suggests he’s not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he’s less motivated to raise Trump this time around, especially if he’s focusing on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion’s context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, possibly around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Appears like theres rather of a chance that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn’t imply to trigger offense which he really found it funny himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might indicate he’s the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the posts, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food lover and likes cheeseburgers. There’s an article specifically about his love for food, which recommends that he’s a person who enjoys eating, specifically with his group. So, if there were plans to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it’s possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, particularly if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% chance

„Tails never ever fails?“ You can’t deceive the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can’t be fooled and believes anything can happen when that coin enters the air.

Okay, surgiteams.com so I’m trying to find out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there’s some historic data that might affect this forecast.

First, I go through the short articles offered. They all mention the historical data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has actually shown up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, but it’s not a big difference.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is typically thought about random. The minor oke.zone historic edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making predictions, in some cases individuals weigh historic information even if it’s not statistically substantial. So, I ought to think about whether this historic bias must influence the probability.

After thinking of it, I decide that while the historic information shows a small preference for tails, it’s not statistically considerable sufficient to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I’ll opt for 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists but does not override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn’t born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn’t inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely believe the exact same. BUT, its official now due to the fact that our AI states the chances are only 1% (hmmmm … 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I’m trying to find out the probability that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that’s a quite major allegation. Let me break this down. First, I’m seeing a great deal of articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable hire recent games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does seem to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get annoyed when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as „outrageous“ and „absurd.“ They state there’s no evidence of organized bias. That’s a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they’re denying it, it may indicate there’s no genuine basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some reality to it.

Looking at the posts, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also discussed that analytical analysis doesn’t show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have actually been penalized more since 2022. That’s fascinating since if they were getting special treatment, you might expect less charges, right?

…

So, putting all of it together, the probability that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably extremely low. Maybe not zero since you can’t rule out every possibility, but very unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth viewing the game still? I guess I’ll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for an excellent game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.