Our new Deepseek-based AI Says

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states „Chiefs vs Eagles? … How Predictable“

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can forecast the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With approximately date news and a small but lively 14 Billion parameter model, our AI is boldly predicting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to address mankind’s toughest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as 2 years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain lots of pushing concerns that are less easy to pin down. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be much better at forecasting the future (and have seen some interesting improvements – research paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion which is really on the smaller side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from numerous months ago so we have actually built an „agentic pipeline“ to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we supply the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown territory to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now … The Important Questions

We postured the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its response. While we have seen prediction enhancements from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis’ relationship is rock solid, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal …

First, I’ll take a look at the essential points from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He’s a big football star, and she’s been helpful of his career, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her loved ones to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.

Some fans are delighted, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially offered comments Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship personal and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I believe the crucial points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he’s plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the chances and forum.pinoo.com.tr his reactions suggest it’s more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I ‘d approximate a low likelihood, maybe around 5%, considering all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 „tush-pushes“ throughout the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn’t stopped the Eagles from using their signature „tush-push“ relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a „tush-push“ is? Does an AI even understand what a „tush“ is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen’s comparable attempts? Looks like our AI believes they’ll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I’m trying to figure out the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 „tush-pushes“ throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand just what a „tush-push“ is. From the posts, it appears like it’s a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It’s compared to pressing a heavy box, so it’s a physical maneuver that requires strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the „tush-push.“ It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The post points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is quite high. … I also need to consider the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are mindful of the Eagles’ „tush-push“ technique, they might adjust their defense appropriately, which might either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five looks like a substantial number but possible given their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, confidence in the strategy, and the possibility that they’ll utilize it numerous times, specifically if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn’t going to pull back from a battle.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He’s done this in his songs, like „The Heart Part 4,“ and even made a statement during a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems substantial because it shows he’s done it before, so possibly he’ll do it again. But wait, looking at more current articles, it mentions that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That could indicate he’s less most likely to address Trump this time.

However, he’s likewise included in a fight with Drake, which might give him factors to make some public statements, even if they’re not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track „Not Like Us.“ There’s a character assassination match from Drake, so maybe he bewares about consisting of any controversial songs in the performance. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it’s uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar might feel obliged to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements during the halftime program, so there’s a threat that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making bold carry on big stages. He’s the first solo rap act to headline the halftime program, which may provide him more innovative flexibility. Plus, his past habits suggests he’s not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I also remember reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he’s less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he’s concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, present shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the event’s context-the likelihood appears to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: bphomesteading.com 25% opportunity

Lets be honest, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the fact that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Appears like theres rather of a chance that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn’t mean to trigger offense and that he in fact discovered it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may show he’s the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Taking a look at the articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There’s a post particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he’s an individual who delights in consuming, particularly with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it’s possible he would engage in a cheeseburger, especially if the scenario is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

„Tails never ever fails?“ You can’t trick the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially lucrative? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can’t be fooled and thinks anything can occur when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I’m attempting to find out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there’s some historical data that may affect this forecast.

First, I review the short articles offered. They all discuss the historical statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has turned up regularly than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a minor edge, but it’s not a huge difference.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is typically considered random. The slight historic edge for tails might be due to opportunity. But when making forecasts, in some cases people weigh historical information even if it’s not statistically substantial. So, I should consider whether this historic predisposition ought to affect the likelihood.

After considering it, I choose that while the historic information reveals a small choice for tails, it’s not statistically substantial sufficient to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I’ll opt for 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the minor historical edge exists but does not bypass the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn’t born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn’t inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely believe the same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI says the chances are only 1% (hmmmm … 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I’m trying to figure out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that’s a quite serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I’m seeing a great deal of posts that talk about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable employ recent video games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as „outrageous“ and „ludicrous.“ They say there’s no proof of organized bias. That’s a strong declaration from the people in charge. If they’re denying it, it might indicate there’s no genuine basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some reality to it.

Taking a look at the posts, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also discussed that analytical analysis doesn’t reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have actually been penalized more because 2022. That’s interesting because if they were getting special treatment, you might expect less penalties, right?

…

So, putting everything together, the possibility that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably very low. Maybe not zero since you can’t eliminate every possibility, however incredibly not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth seeing the video game still? I guess I’ll have to wait and see how the video game ends up before we release this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.